Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Takeda, Takeshi
JAEA-Data/Code 2023-012, 75 Pages, 2023/10
JAEA-Data-Code-2023-012.pdf:4.45MB
An experiment denoted as TR-LF-15 was conducted on June 11, 2014 using the Large Scale Test Facility (LSTF) in the Rig of Safety Assessment-V (ROSA-V) Program. The ROSA/LSTF experiment TR-LF-15 simulated accident management (AM) actions during a station blackout transient with TMLB' scenario with pump seal loss-of-coolant accident (LOCA) in a pressurized water reactor (PWR). This scenario is featured by loss of auxiliary feedwater functions. The pump seal LOCA was simulated by a 0.1% cold leg break. The test assumptions included total failure of both high pressure injection system and low pressure injection system of emergency core cooling system (ECCS). Also, it was presumed non-condensable gas (nitrogen gas) inflow to the primary system from accumulator (ACC) tanks of ECCS. When steam generator (SG) secondary-side collapsed liquid level dropped to a certain low liquid level, the primary pressure turned to rise. After the SG secondary-side became voided, the safety valve of a pressurizer cyclically opened which led to loss of primary coolant. Core uncovery thus took place owing to core boil-off at high pressure. When an increase of 10 K was confirmed in cladding surface temperature of simulated fuel rods, SG secondary-side depressurization was started as the first AM action. At that time, the safety valves in both SGs were fully opened. Primary depressurization was initiated by completely opening the pressurizer safety valve as the second AM action with some delay after the first AM action onset. When the SG secondary-side pressure lowered to 1.0 MPa following the first AM action, water was injected into the secondary-side of both SGs via feedwater lines with low-head pumps as the third AM action. A reduction in the primary pressure was accelerated because the heat removal from the SG secondary-side system resumed shortly after the third AM action initiation.
Takeda, Takeshi
JAEA-Data/Code 2021-006, 61 Pages, 2021/04
JAEA-Data-Code-2021-006.pdf:2.78MB
An experiment denoted as SB-PV-09 was conducted on November 17, 2005 using the Large Scale Test Facility (LSTF) in the Rig of Safety Assessment-V (ROSA-V) Program. The ROSA/LSTF experiment SB-PV-09 simulated a 1.9% pressure vessel top small-break loss-of-coolant accident in a pressurized water reactor (PWR). The test assumptions included total failure of high pressure injection system and non-condensable gas (nitrogen gas) inflow to the primary system from accumulator (ACC) tanks of emergency core cooling system (ECCS). In the experiment, liquid level in the upper-head was found to control break flow rate. When maximum core exit temperature reached 623 K, steam generator (SG) secondary-side depressurization was initiated by fully opening the relief valves in both SGs as an accident management (AM) action. The AM action, however, was ineffective on the primary depressurization until the SG secondary-side pressure decreased to the primary pressure. Meanwhile, the core power was automatically reduced when maximum cladding surface temperature of simulated fuel rods exceeded the pre-determined value of 958 K to protect the LSTF core due to late and slow response of core exit temperature. After the automatic core power reduction, loop seal clearing (LSC) was induced in both loops by steam condensation on the ACC coolant injected into cold legs. The whole core was quenched because of core recovery after the LSC. After the ACC tanks started to discharge nitrogen gas, the pressure difference between the primary and SG secondary sides became larger. After the continuous core cooling was confirmed through the actuation of low pressure injection system of ECCS, the experiment was terminated. This report summarizes the test procedures, conditions, and major observations in the ROSA/LSTF experiment SB-PV-09.
Uesawa, Shinichiro; Horiguchi, Naoki; Suzuki, Takayuki*; Shibata, Mitsuhiko; Yoshida, Hiroyuki
Proceedings of 12th International Topical Meeting on Nuclear Reactor Thermal-Hydraulics, Operation and Safety (NUTHOS-12) (USB Flash Drive), 11 Pages, 2018/10
Takeda, Takeshi
JAEA-Data/Code 2018-003, 60 Pages, 2018/03
JAEA-Data-Code-2018-003.pdf:3.68MB
Experiment SB-PV-07 was conducted on June 9, 2005 using LSTF. Experiment simulated 1% pressure vessel top small-break LOCA in PWR under total failure of HPI system and nitrogen gas inflow to primary system from ACC tanks. Liquid level in upper-head was found to control break flow rate. Coolant was started to manually inject from HPI system into cold legs as first accident management (AM) action when maximum core exit temperature reached 623 K. Fuel rod surface temperature largely increased because of late and slow response of core exit temperature. SG secondary-side depressurization was initiated by fully opening relief valves as second AM action when primary pressure decreased to 4 MPa. However, second AM action was not effective on primary depressurization until SG secondary-side pressure decreased to primary pressure. Pressure difference became larger between primary and SG secondary sides after ACC tanks started to discharge nitrogen gas.
Uchibori, Akihiro; Watanabe, Akira*; Takata, Takashi; Ohshima, Hiroyuki
Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, 54(10), p.1036 - 1045, 2017/10
Times Cited Count：5 Percentile：44.07(Nuclear Science & Technology)To evaluate a sodium-water reaction phenomenon in a steam generator of sodium-cooled fast reactors, a computational fluid dynamics code SERAPHIM, in which a compressible multicomponent multiphase flow with sodium-water chemical reaction is computed, has been developed. The original SERAPHIM code is based on the difference method. In this study, unstructured mesh-based numerical method was developed to advance a numerical accuracy for the complex-shaped domain including multiple heat transfer tubes. Numerical analysis of an underexpanded jet experiment was performed as part of validation of the unstructured mesh-based numerical method. The calculated pressure profile showed good agreement with the experimental data. Applicability of the numerical method for the actual situation was confirmed through the analysis of water vapor discharging into liquid sodium. The effect of use of the unstructured mesh was also investigated by the two analyses using structured and unstructured mesh.
4 bundle at 2 MPaLiu, W.; Nagatake, Taku; Shibata, Mitsuhiko; Takase, Kazuyuki; Yoshida, Hiroyuki
Transactions of the American Nuclear Society, 114, p.875 - 878, 2016/06
To contribute to the clarification of the Fukushima Daiichi Accident, JAEA is working on getting instantaneous void fraction distribution data in steam water two - phase flow in rod bundle geometry under high pressure, high temperature condition, with using Wire Mesh Sensor (WMS) developed at JAEA for high pressure, high temperature condition, focusing on the low flow rate condition after the reactor scram. This paper reports the experimental results for the measured void fraction distribution in steam vapor two-phase flow in a 4 4 bundle under 1.6 MPa (202 
C), 2.1 MPa (215 C) and 2.6 MPa (226 C) conditions. The data is expected to be used in the validation of the detailed two-phase flow codes TPFIT and ACE3D developed at JAEA. The time and space averaged void fraction data is also expected being used in the validation of the drift flux models implemented in the two fluids codes, such as TRACE code.
Takeda, Takeshi
JAEA-Data/Code 2015-022, 58 Pages, 2016/01
JAEA-Data-Code-2015-022.pdf:3.31MB
The SB-HL-12 test simulated PWR 1% hot leg SBLOCA under assumptions of total failure of HPI system and non-condensable gas (nitrogen gas) inflow. SG depressurization by fully opening relief valves in both SGs as AM action was initiated immediately after maximum fuel rod surface temperature reached 600 K. After AM action due to first core uncovery by core boil-off, the primary pressure decreased, causing core mixture level swell. The fuel rod surface temperature then increased up to 635 K. Second core uncovery by core boil-off took place before LSC induced by steam condensation on ACC coolant injected into cold legs. The core liquid level recovered rapidly after LSC. The fuel rod surface temperature then increased up to 696 K. The pressure difference became larger between the primary and SG secondary sides after nitrogen gas inflow. Third core uncovery by core boil-off occurred during reflux condensation. The maximum fuel rod surface temperature exceeded 908 K.
Takeda, Takeshi
JAEA-Data/Code 2014-021, 59 Pages, 2014/11
JAEA-Data-Code-2014-021.pdf:5.16MB
Experiment SB-CL-32 was conducted on May 28, 1996 using the LSTF. The experiment SB-CL-32 simulated 1% cold leg small-break LOCA in PWR under assumptions of total failure of HPI system and no inflow of non-condensable gas from ACC tanks. Secondary-side depressurization of both SGs as AM action to achieve the depressurization rate of 200 K/h in the primary system was initiated 10 min after break. Core uncovery started with liquid level drop in crossover leg downflow-side. The core liquid level recovered rapidly after first LSC. The surface temperature of simulated fuel rod then increased up to 669 K. Core uncovery took place before second LSC induced by steam condensation on ACC coolant. The core liquid level recovered rapidly after second LSC. The maximum fuel rod surface temperature was 772 K. The continuous core cooling was confirmed because of coolant injection by LPI system. This report summarizes the test procedures, conditions and major observation.
Nishihara, Tetsuo; Shimizu, Akira; Inagaki, Yoshiyuki; Tanihira, Masanori*
Nihon Genshiryoku Gakkai Wabun Rombunshi, 2(4), p.517 - 524, 2003/12
no abstracts in English
Onuki, Akira; Kamo, Hideki*; Akimoto, Hajime
JAERI-Data/Code 99-038, 108 Pages, 1999/08
JAERI-Data-Code-99-038.pdf:5.2MB
no abstracts in English
Sudo, Yukio; Kaminaga, Masanori
Nucl. Eng. Des., 187, p.215 - 227, 1999/00
Times Cited Count：7 Percentile：49.64(Nuclear Science & Technology)no abstracts in English
Nakamura, Hideo
JAERI-Research 96-022, 135 Pages, 1996/05
JAERI-Research-96-022.pdf:3.86MB
no abstracts in English
Moriyama, Kiyofumi; Yamano, N.; Maruyama, Yu; Kudo, Tamotsu; Sugimoto, Jun
Proc. of ASME
JSME 4th Int. Conf. on Nuclear Engineering 1996 (ICONE-4), 1(PART B), p.903 - 915, 1996/00
no abstracts in English
H.Lee*; H.Seong*; G.Park*; Kumamaru, Hiroshige; Kukita, Yutaka
Proc. of ASMEJSME 4th Int. Conf. on Nuclear Engineering 1996 (ICONE-4), 3, p.41 - 50, 1996/00
no abstracts in English
Nakamura, Hideo; Kukita, Yutaka; *
Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, 32(9), p.868 - 879, 1995/09
Times Cited Count：4 Percentile：43.23(Nuclear Science & Technology)no abstracts in English
Nakamura, Hideo; Kukita, Yutaka; *
Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, 32(7), p.641 - 652, 1995/07
Times Cited Count：5 Percentile：49.46(Nuclear Science & Technology)no abstracts in English
G.R.Noghrehkar*; Kawaji, Masahiro*; A.M.C.Chan*; Nakamura, Hideo; Kukita, Yutaka
J. Fluids Eng., 117, p.1 - 9, 1995/03
no abstracts in English
Suzuki, Mitsuhiro
JAERI-Tech 94-029, 43 Pages, 1994/11
no abstracts in English
Kumamaru, Hiroshige; Kukita, Yutaka
Nucl. Eng. Des., 144, p.257 - 268, 1993/00
Times Cited Count：1 Percentile：18.76(Nuclear Science & Technology)no abstracts in English
Nakamura, Hideo; Murata, Hideo; Ito, Hideo; Anoda, Yoshinari; Kumamaru, Hiroshige; Kukita, Yutaka
Kashika Joho Gakkai-Shi, 12(47), p.47 - 56, 1992/10
no abstracts in English
